|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/31/2020)
|
Somebody ought to inform this misguided person that a revolution IS underway - a Marxist revolution. The BLM's leadership and the ANITFA "community activists" have said so and continue to demonstrate that, explicitly.
To cast peaceable people who don't employ force until they are imminently threatened as the provocateurs is simple-minded babble (or calculated agitprop).
And the hand-wringing Amen Chorus in the article's comments section is full of card-carrying "useful idiots."
According to Merriam Webster's definition of "deviate" ( to stray especially from a standard, principle, or topic), it is this cadre of sad sacks who are the antithesis of this nation's founding principles, not the rest of us.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|