|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/23/2015)
|
There's already multiple legislative bills introduced in both state legislatures and Congress to effect the same ban, but encompassing just about all popular center-fire sporting calibers and a penology of bullets.
IOW you could say a small minority of an infinitesimally small percentage (some 500 odd out of 300+million) are claiming an "entitlement" to punish millions for their ingenuity, skills and zeal in pursuing harmless sporting/recreational activities.
The real "victims" in this kerfuffle are the nation's LEOs. Having been given 5.56mm weapons out of the U.S. arsenal, they're now denied affordable training ammo. A suspicious mind might say its one way to tie LEOs to the federal tit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
