|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Another civil war, really?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When the confederacy decided to leave the union, the federal government did not wish them bon voyage. It launched a full scale war; and upon winning the war, the principle that the union could not be dissolved was enshrined.
As one of the states with the most aversion to guns and the strictest gun and ammunition control laws, California could not be in a worse position to fight the full force of the United States military should they somehow succeed in the quixotic quest to start a second civil war.
Those wishing to secede will have discovered too late that the purpose of the second amendment was to be able to resist a government which had become oppressive to them; it was never about shooting squirrels and deer. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(12/2/2016)
|
| Seriously, if Kommiefornia wants to leave, let them. It'll be an improvement for everyone involved. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/2/2016)
|
" ... Those wishing to secede will have discovered too late that the purpose of the second amendment was to be able to resist a government which had become oppressive to them ... "
Fedgov OPPRESSIVE to them? Considering their taxes and gunlaws, I suggest it's the California govt. that's "oppressive."
Let 'em go? Sure, and Bon Voyage .... but the people there will still be stuck with petty tyrants.
So why should I worry? Let them reap what they've sowed.................................... |
| Comment by:
jdege
(12/2/2016)
|
| The Union did not launch a full scale war, South Carolina did. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/2/2016)
|
| I think we should surrender to 'em and let Cali succeed. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
