|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
How Much More do They Expect us to Compromise on Gun Rights?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I always hear gun control proponents ask, “Why won’t the pro-gunners compromise? Why won’t they give into something?” Are you kidding? Do you have any idea how long it takes to get a suppresser for my gun, so that if God forbid there’s ever a home invasion and I have to shoot the intruder I don’t blow my eardrums out?
Since the time the Second Amendment was written pro-gunners have been compromising. We went from arms to only owning semi-auto handguns and rifles while the government gets to play with drones. |
| Comment by:
gariders
(7/30/2016)
|
| do I hear an 'amen" |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/30/2016)
|
20,000 gun control lasw. THAT'S how many laws there are in America controlling guns.
DON'T tell me we haven't compromised!!!!!!!!!
We have.
And nearly every time, we lose something ....full auto..... sometimes open carry or conceal carry, 10 round+ magazines.....rifles with detachable mags....Supposed "assault weapons........sometimes, like Chicago, EVERYTHING.
Why won't we "give them anything?"
When will they stop wanting something?
Then why should I believe them when they tell me they just want reasonable gun laws? Why shouldn't I believe they're wanting to confiscate ALL our guns? |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/31/2016)
|
It's so reassuring to see more and more women holding the "testosterone" view of firearms and self-defense.
There are certainly things in life where women should take the lead, and then there are things where men should take the lead.
Smart men and women KNOW that.
This lady is one of them. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
