|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Are ‘gun-free zones’ an acceptable form of discrimination?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A furor that erupted over the weekend and continues today over Indiana’s new 'Religious Freedom Restoration Act' provided Seattle Mayor Ed Murray an opportunity to condemn discrimination, noting that people cannot refuse service based on their religious beliefs."
"The fury over Indiana should give people an opportunity to reflect on all the different kinds of discrimination there are, and one in particular that seems to get a pass. That’s discrimination against gun owners, who have just as much right as anyone else to go about their daily lives and be left alone." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/31/2015)
|
Maybe we need for someone to create a church/religion where firearms are iconic symbols ? Kudos for Indiana's RFRA IAC ! We've long observed how our "elitist leadership" is fascist. Now we're seeing yet another instance.
Mostly this a case of the kettle calling the pot black. Seems the LGBT types don't want "equality of treatment" from the society they inhabit. They want "exceptionalism" ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
