|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Court Says 2nd Amendment Doesn’t Trump State's Strict Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A Bergen County man has lost his bid to fight the confiscation of his guns and ammunition following a domestic violence arrest and charges that he had high-capacity magazines and hollow-point ammunition. An appellate decision on Tuesday upheld a Superior Court judge’s earlier ruling that Arthur Vinogradsky was no longer qualified to be a gun owner even though the charges against him were eventually dropped. |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/25/2016)
|
Malfeasance.
Heller clearly established that bearing arms is a fundamental right, and that while some restrictions are permissible they cannot materially deny the right.
Whether or not one agrees with that holding, it IS precedent and is binding on lower courts. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/25/2016)
|
And all this time I thought that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.
Ooooooooooooooooooops. (/sarcasm) |
Comment by:
stevelync
(5/26/2016)
|
And there are fools who thought that kristy Kreeme the supreme overlord of NJ, would make a good POTUS. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|