|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: Burglar Breaks Into Home Where 3 Women Are Sleeping & What Happens Next Is 'Game-Changer'
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“My oldest daughter, Sharaia, she went back into her bedroom, got her gun and came back out. She cocked her gun. He looked up, and he heard it, got scared and ran. I told her instantly to start shooting him. So she started shooting him in the hallway. He managed to make it out the front door. Once he got to the last step, she got him one more time, and he fell. We left. We went back in the house to check on the kids. We came back out, and he was gone.”
...
Spartanburg police told Fox Carolina the suspect, Samuel Jeter, had been shot four times in the buttocks.
Ed.: Nice grouping, ladies. |
Comment by:
dasing
(11/4/2017)
|
Wrong, wrong, wrong...when the criminal is running away It is unlawful to shot them!!!!!! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|