|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: There is room for both gun control, 2nd Amendment
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I am very pleased yet cautiously optimistic to see Orleans Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro’s call for reasonable gun control.
New Orleanians know all too the well the violence, loss of life and destruction of families that occur on a daily basis but rarely makes the national news. It is a sad state of affairs when as a nation we are so accustomed to mass shootings that even when a mass shooting occurs at a playground, if no one dies, it does not even register at the national level. Therefore, it is refreshing to see an elected official, who by his own admission “believes in the Constitution and in the Second Amendment in particular” call for gun control measures. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(12/24/2015)
|
| France has more body count in mass shooting this year than all 7 years of Obama's term. Charlie Hebdo, Jewish center, and Paris attack. Of course if they only had common sense gun control this would not happen. Oh wait, they do. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
