
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MA: Lexington Man Indicated After Dozens of Guns, Ammo Seized From His Home
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A 49-year-old Lexington man was indicted Tuesday on firearms charges after Lexington police seized 83 guns and 10,000 rounds of ammunition from his home during an investigation into allegations that Robert Ivarson racially harassed his black neighbors. A Middlesex grand jury on Tuesday indicated Ivarson, 49, of Lexington, on charges of possession of a large-capacity firearm (two counts), possession of a firearm without a firearms identification card (three counts) and possession of chemical mace without an FID card. |
Comment by:
-none-
(5/10/2017)
|
if you have an issue, solve it or move but do not become a police state statistic. Next MA will go after online commenters.
sometimes even a gun (or 2 guns in first case) doesn't do the trick:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ee8_1494290230
Good Samaritans come to the aid of two female Tampa cops
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=967_1494287968
Bodycam Footage Of Fatal Officer Involved Shooting - Englewood, Ohio
russia: no gun?, no problem:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=857_1494317901
Brutal killing on the pedestrian crossing
The record shows how one man caught up with another on the pedestrian crossing, then attacked him and inflicted on his opponent a series of knife strikes to the head, neck and torso. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|