| 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
     
  
    | CA: Sheriff an enforcer, not a judge Submitted by: 
			
Bruce W. Krafft
 Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
 | 
			There 
				are 2  comments 
			 	on this storyPost Comments | Read Comments
 |  
    | "It feels a bit silly to write this, as what I’m going to say is so blatantly obvious, but unfortunately there seems to be a need to say this. The sheriff’s job is to enforce laws, not act as a judge as to whether the laws are constitutional — that’s what the judicial system is for. Having a law enforcement officer unilaterally declaring a law unconstitutional is blatantly unconstitutional in itself and is more akin to totalitarianism." ...
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     jac
     (6/17/2015) |  
    | People like this letter writer make me cringe. 
 The sheriff swore an oath to uphold the constitution.  Many of the laws coming out of the legislature and by proposition are blatantly unconstitutional, however that doesn't stop the liberals from passing them and liberal courts from upholding them, nonwithstanding the constitution.  A prime example is the four liberals on the supreme court of the US that have demonstrated their contempt for the constitution time and time again.
 
 When a LEO has to chose between the constitution and the law, his duty is to uphold the constitution.
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     Millwright66
     (6/17/2015) |  
    | Mr. Werdinger should have paid more attention in Civics.  A sheriff is an "elected law enforcement responsible only to the electorate". His oath of office is to 'support and uphold the Constitution of the United States' and he - and the his jurisdiction's electorate - are the determinants of what that shall be. 
 Our nations Sheriff's are the 'law-enforcement arm of the people', and not subservient or bound to their state or the federal government.
 |  
 
 |  |