|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
GA: Militia group's numbers grow in wake of election of President Trump
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A militia billing itself as a security force is vowing to protect the Second Amendment.
The Three Percent Security force, named after those who fought in the American revolution (It's said - only three percent of the colonists fought against the king's tyranny) says they're preparing to "uphold and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic."
They train like a military, "basic infantry man skills, everything from communications to combat lifesaving medical first aid."
Founded in Henry County, the group started out as an anti- President Barack Obama group, before openly supporting President Donald Trump's run for President. ...
The group said they'll vow to protect the Second Amendment, even under Trump. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/24/2017)
|
I strongly respect those who form or serve in militias when the purpose is to defend the U.S. Constitution and esp. the Second Amendment.
However, in truth I cannot say I believe President trump is any danger to the 2A. His sons are gun owners, hunters, and IMHO, have shown their father the light on the 2A.
If Hillary Clintoon had won, the matter would be entirely different ---- and we may yet face her kind again in the future!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
