|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
KY: Welcome to Tombstone (aka Kentucky) where the right to bear arms is truly unlimited
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Kentucky General Assembly, in its infinite wisdom, decided during its historically terrible session this year to let every Tom, Dick, and Larry carry a sidearm wherever they might happen to be, leading to speculation that perhaps it would be wise to change the name of the Commonwealth of Kentucky to Tombstone.
Previously, Kentucky law required an individual to obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon and undergo some form of training so they could at least tell one end of a gun from another. That is no longer necessary. Now, if an individual is at least 21 years of age and doesn’t have a criminal record, he or she can mutate into Annie Oakley. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/21/2019)
|
Another chicken little liberal. There have not been any problems anywhere constitutional carry was implemented and there have been none in Kentucky.
All this law does is allow any law abiding citizen to carry a handgun without having to pay a fee and submit to arbitrary requirements.
Criminals will have guns anyway, regardless of the law. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
