|

|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
xqqme
(9/13/2019)
|
OK, so these lawmakers want to allow governments to TAKE CIVIL RIGHTS away without due process or compensation, as if there could be any adequate compensation for a person deprived of the Right to effective self defense for lack of a firearm who is murdered by the ex-boyfriend (ex-girlfriend, estranged spouse, etc.) who filed the original complaint in order to disarm their intended victim, or a surprised homeowner answering the door to a cadre of police demanding his firearms. It it costs even ONE LIFE, this monstrosity of Red Flag Laws, is it worth it? . Wait a minute... it already has cost a life, hasn't it? . Red Flag Laws killed Gary J. Willis, and Nadler and his ilk care not at all. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/13/2019)
|
Oh, but you're missing the point xqqme -
According to Nadler, Gary J. Willis wasn't an "innocent" victim. He was a white male gun owner. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|