|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: League of Women Voters will lead battle with NRA over 'guns on campus' bills
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
gue of Women Voters of Florida said it will lead opposition this year to two controversial proposals to authorize loaded guns on school campuses, from small elementary schools to colleges brimming with tens of thousands of students." ...
"The counterpoint to the pro-gun arguments mainly came from school leaders and campus public safety officials. This year, the League of Women Voters wants to help amplify those arguments using its statewide network of activists."
"'Campus carry bills are very concerning because they really have nothing to do with the Second Amendment,' said Orlando resident Patti Brigham, chairwoman of the organization’s Gun Safety Committee that was launched last year. 'This is a public safety issue.'" ... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/11/2015)
|
"League of Women Voters"?
The same cadre who brought us the 19th Amendment and Prohibition.
BAH!
Tell them to siddown and shaddup. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
