|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jughead
(11/15/2017)
|
| there is no common ground when it comes to gun control. just look back at history give them what they want now and next year they will want more. NO MORE COMPROMISE PERIOD |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/15/2017)
|
It just upends the traditional self-defense, the laws that have been working in Ohio, shifts the whole burden of proof to the prosecutor.
Where did this cretin attend school? It is a First Principle of the United States of America that the burden of proof in criminal cases is ALWAYS on the state.
A.L.W.A.Y.S. |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/15/2017)
|
Not as long as the gun control crowd bases their opposition on emotion and ignores facts.
There is no such thing as "sensible gun control". It is a talking point created by the liberal left to cover their true agenda.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
