
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Unlawful immigrants can have gun rights, appeals court rules
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"In the case of a Milwaukee man deported over a single .22-caliber cartridge, a federal appeals court ruled last week that even unlawful immigrants can be part of 'the public' that enjoys a Second Amendment right to keep a gun for self-defense."
"The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said even undocumented immigrants can be part of 'the people' protected by the Bill of Rights, though it upheld the man's conviction on a specific law that prohibits most such people from having guns." ... |
Comment by:
-none-
(8/26/2015)
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAH6SACn9lE Live Shooting WDBJ wow!!
today's endless supply of anti gun comments from abroad, hating on the USA...
"And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why guns should be banned. America can't seem to get the message. More guns = more gun crime. Simple as that. Guns shouldn't have been legal in the first place. Guns have never been legal here in the UK and gun crime is evidently minimal in comparison. Reply · 459"
"Chris Hobson americans need disarming Reply · 230"
Raptur United States, please, wake up, stop selling weapons Reply · 30
Captain Hero Look at all the morons, defending the ownership of guns. Less guns = less crimes, you idiots. It's that simple. Reply · 52 |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|