|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CT: Delegation Wants Tougher Gun Laws To Aid Fight Against Islamic State
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The day after a self-radicalized gunman killed 49 people in a crowded Florida nightclub, members of Connecticut's congressional delegation said stricter gun control laws are necessary to aid in the fight against the Islamic State. "Assault weapons are becoming the weapon of choice for terrorists in this country," U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy said at a press conference Monday morning at the state Capitol, where he was joined by Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Rep. Elizabeth Esty. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/14/2016)
|
"[M]embers of Connecticut's congressional delegation said stricter gun control laws are necessary to aid in the fight against the Islamic State."
Yes. Of COURSE they did.
They're Democrats.
Just tell them to siddown and shaddup.
Then, IGNORE them. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
