|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Clinton says she’s not coming for your guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Clinton referred Trump’s repeated accusations that she plans on abolishing the Second Amendment, a claim which fact-checkers have disputed and gun rights advocates bolster with her own comments about favoring what they call Australian-style gun confiscation.
Clinton said her administration will work with responsible gun owners to pass reforms that would “keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.” |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/30/2016)
|
"Clinton said her administration will work with responsible gun owners to pass reforms that would 'keep guns out of the hands of criminals, terrorists and all others who would do us harm.'"
Yea ... don't be surprised when the government decides we're all the "criminals, terrorists and all others..."
And of course, no mention of her admiring the Australian gun ban.
I don't think "they're coming for our guns" means the same thing to Clinton & cronies as it does to us.
They'd be happy banning everything other than Brown Besses and telling us, "see, you still have your guns."
Keep your powder dry. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(7/30/2016)
|
I never sent or received classified emails.
Hillary |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
