|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: DOJ sues Virginia over weapons ban that took effect Wednesday
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Virginia legislation banning the sale and manufacture of certain semi-automatic firearms took effect Wednesday, and the U.S. Department of Justice didn't waste time filing a lawsuit alleging the new law is unconstitutional.
Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed the legislation earlier this year. The ban makes it a misdemeanor, for people to buy, sell, transfer, import or manufacture an “assault firearm.” This charge could be punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.
In a press release from the DOJ, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche condemned the constitutionality of the new law. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(7/2/2026)
|
| THE VA GOV SHOULD HAVE TO PAY OUT OF POCKET TO DEFEND HER SIGNING SUCH A BLATENTLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL BILL. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
