|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: Sheriff says new gun bill could jeopardize public safety
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
that requirement, allowing the stores selling firearms to do the background check instead.
Reid believes that change could put people at risk by removing local law enforcement's knowledge of a problem.
"Identified gang members that have not been convicted of a crime that would keep them from getting a purchase permit,” Reid said. “But our officers know who they are and that they're a threat to society."
In North Carolina, a sheriff can reject a gun permit based on moral grounds. |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(6/5/2015)
|
Guilt by association...
Presumption of innocence tossed out the window...
Sheriff acts as judge and practices fortune telling...
Sound constitutional?
The believers in an achievable utopia are willing to toss everyone's freedom away for their dream... one that can never be fulfilled. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/5/2015)
|
Requiring permits to purchase is facially unconstitutional.
Permits to carry are also unconstitutional unless there is an avenue for carrying without a permit, such as "concealed" v. "open". If open carry doesn't require a permit, then CCW permits can be required because the RKBA isn't materially infringed. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
