|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/4/2017)
|
A bunch of twaddle!
Chicago still has strict gun laws, and few if any gunstores. The libs are still whining about guns being smuggled in from nearby areas. Why aren't those areas just as violent as Chicago if the guns are the problem?
Society is COLLAPSING in Chicago....gang violence, drugs, spurred by collapsing family structure feed this vicious cycle.
Banning guns will not help. Chicago must heal itself and it's leaders ought to stop whining for more ineffective gun laws. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/4/2017)
|
Note that this idiot's only lament is that the SCOTUS forced Chitown to obey the Constitution.
Hmnph. Obey the Constitution. Imagine THAT! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
