|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
We Should Ban All Semi-Automatic Firearms
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Atrios says that if lefties want to fire people up about gun control, they need to get more passionate about it:
To inspire hardcore single issue voters you have to take an absolutist stance on things. I’m not saying this is good politics….Still, there is literally no politician who goes on teevee and says, “the courts won’t allow it right now, but if it were up to me I’d put the well-regulated back in the 2nd amendment and make it extremely difficult for people to own most kinds of guns, and we should work long term to appoint judges who have a more reasonable view of what our constitution plainly says.” |
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(11/7/2017)
|
| Kevin Drum and Mother Jones should just sit down. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/7/2017)
|
| I don't think "well regulated" means what you think it means....... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/7/2017)
|
MarkHamTownsend, regardless of which connotation is applied to the term "well regulated", grammatically it modifies the noun "militia", not the noun "right" nor the noun, "people". According to that sentence, it is militias that are intended to be "well regulated", not the individuals' right to bear arms.
Therefore Kevin's philistine argument that the latter is intended to be "well regulated" is absurd on its face. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/7/2017)
|
True Phorto.
I didn't have time to post a longer comment. Plus to be honest I am sick and tired of this clearly WRONG interpretation of "well regulated militia."
We are in danger of losing the language....this is only one sympton.
And we will lose our rights too, if it continues. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
