
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: We don’t need a national registry for guns (first letter)
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"If a person is deemed so mentally unfit that legal gun ownership is forbidden, why isn’t that person institutionalized and given care instead of violating Second Amendment protections for all others?"
"The Pandora’s Box of diagnosing mental illness regrading the Second Amendment is dangerously double-edged. Does the APA determine mental fitness? Your prescriptions? A bureaucrat? The Brady Campaign? Family? Friends?"
"What’s to keep someone from maliciously reporting another as 'deficient'? What mental issues, spelled out in law, makes someone unable to legally own a weapon? Are they the same for holding public office?" ... |
Comment by:
laker1
(7/15/2015)
|
Why are they out and about if they can't be trusted with a gun, gasoline, ball bat, bow and arrow, knife, etc? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|