|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Is Remington Outdoor about to go bankrupt?
Submitted by:
jac
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
What was once an upbeat mood in the gun industry, fostered by a multi-year rally in weapon sales, has now become a major hangover. The most obvious indicator of that change: Privately-held Remington Outdoor is now at risk of declaring bankruptcy after a collapse in sales and profits.
The rifle and shotgun manufacturer's third-quarter sales plunged 41% as demand for firearms dried up. That led Remington to report adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization that were 78% lower year over year.
And with its credit rating in the trash bin, the future is bleak for "America's oldest gunmaker".
|
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/9/2017)
|
Remington, now part of Cerburus , has become it's own enemy. A few years ago it produced the R51 automatic, a modern version of an old gun, but they royally scwewed the pooch on quality assurance, causing many returns and a 2.0 version. Many gun people are leery of its products....the model 700 rifle due to its trigger....less than stellar in the model 870 shotgun.....
If they'd make good guns, and cater to their customers wants, they'd be in a better position to weather a downturn in purchasing. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
