|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(3/16/2018)
|
| You MUST mean patriots who fight anti-Americans like you!!! |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/16/2018)
|
If you can't win with facts resort to name calling.
The fact is that these guns are not going to go away even if the politicians ban them.
If you want to talk about cowards, I don't see liberals joining the military. They would rather complain and whine than face actual danger. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/16/2018)
|
Yea, calling me a coward for defending my 2A right to own my ARs is such a phantasmagorically terrific argument that I immediately gave every penny I own to various antigun organizations.
Anyone who believes the above sentence is a bigger idiot than the one who wrote the article in the linked story. ;) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
