|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IL: The Second Amendment isn't sacred
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's time to repeal the Second Amendment. Replace it with an amendment that will restrict the ownership of guns to members of the military, police forces, national guards and other state-sanctioned legitimate groups that have been entrusted by the states with the important responsibility of maintaining the safety and security of all citizens. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/7/2016)
|
Re: Title
Oh, yes it is. All of our fundamental individual rights are sacred, having been endowed by our Creator.
Re: repealing the Second Amendment
The right doesn't exist because of the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment exists because of the right.
"The right there specified is that of 'bearing arms for a lawful purpose'. This is not a right granted by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence." - U.S v. Cruikshank (1875) |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(10/7/2016)
|
| The only thing stopping the gun grabbers is they know allot of guns will come bullets first At least I hope they would |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
