|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Will police confiscate guns if the government orders it?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Should an absolute, end-of-the-world-type disaster occur or should the government simply try to outlaw firearms, many people are fearful that the local or federal law enforcement officers will start knocking on doors and taking away guns and ammunition. Frankly, I don’t believe that’s going to happen, but that doesn’t make the fear of it any less real or warranted to others."
"In recent times a growing tide of fear and skepticism has come about regarding the federal government (and, in some cases, the local government) taking away more rights—inalienable and natural rights necessary to preserve life and liberty. No doubt, those rights have been slowly trampled upon in my lifetime." ... |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(4/8/2015)
|
| If anyone believes that the Police along with any other Government Agency won't turn on the honest citizens you know very little history |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(4/8/2015)
|
There will be some who will fight it, and be dismissed from the force, after which their supervisors, being the power-hungry elitists thay are, and so sure that they, and they only, know what's best for the masses, will hire properly obedient thugs more than willing.
History demonstrates this. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
