|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/15/2020)
|
She could have politely declined to let them enter her home; she didn't.
I'm more concerned with the civics values she's (not) inculcating in her son than I am with the snitch poltroon who dropped the dime.
The "you have nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide" nonsense sounds 'reasonable,' but it isn't.
A friend of mine calls this phenomenon "Prosperity Paradox" -- the atrophied state of being so pampered and comfortable living in America that one gets soft and unwary.
Just so.
Middle America needs to butch up, and this is a disturbing example. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(6/15/2020)
|
| A school administrator needs to get a parking lot visit. It's the pinnacle of Marxist arrogance to pretend that your school "authortity" extends into a private home. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
