|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Canada: Tactless to destroy historic guns
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Re: 'Amnesty pulls guns off streets' (April 5)"
"I am thrilled to see that police are making headway in the battle against gun violence, especially since so many of these crimes involve stolen guns."
"At the same time, I find it extremely bizarre that the Hamilton police are taking such a dogmatic approach with respect to some of the historical items."
"After all, even if someone was able to steal an older weapon from a safely locked museum, who would commit a break and enter with a flintlock pistol from 1820, or better yet, a muzzle-loading musket from the 18th century?" ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|