|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
| Test. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/14/2019)
|
"Some gun-rights activists would murder government officials who try to enforce a duly passed law."
No, they would attack a government and its officials who try to enforce a 'duly passed' UNCONTITUTIONAL law that promiscuously discards the Constitution's command that it may not do so.
That ain't 'murder'.
That would be The People exercising their DoI right to alter or abolish a government that deliberately defied its duty to secure their individual rights, and attempted to nullify those rights by force. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
