|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: What Turned Fury at North Carolina Muslim Neighbors to Murder
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Whether the triple homicide in North Carolina was triggered by a parking dispute or by a hatred of Muslims or both, this is certain:
The murder weapon was a handgun.
Without the gun, there would have been no triple funeral on Thursday for 23-year-old Deah Shaddy Barakat and 21-year-old Yusor Mohammad and 19-year-old Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/14/2015)
|
A most curious assumption on the part of Mr. Daley arises early in his diatribe when he asserts it was the gun's fault. Daley "overlooks" the perp was a self-avowed liberal and fan/supporter of liberal scribes, media and causes. Likewise Daley overlooks another real world reality. The perp, denied a gun by the state, could as easily armed himself with a variety of commonly available "weapons" from any hardware store.
Multiple reports, (including his own), indicate the perp was possessed of an extremely irascible/volitile nature. Indeed one might opine this "good liberal" was of an extremely intolerant nature. And then "acted out" his emotions.
Maybe we ought to be disarming liberals.... |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(2/15/2015)
|
| I have it on good authority that The Daily Beast is published from Uranus. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
