|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Guns Banned From Part Of NRA Convention, NRA Tells Members To Obey
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The National Rifle Association is holding its annual convention in Nashville, Tennessee, this week, but guns will be banned in a major area of the gathering."
"The NRA broke the good and bad news to its members on its Facebook page:""'During the 2015 NRA Annual Meeting & Exhibits, lawfully carried firearms will be permitted in the Music City Center with the proper license in accordance with Tennessee law. Bridgestone Arena prohibits the possession of firearms. When carrying your firearm, remember to follow all federal, state and local laws.'" "Some Nashville hotels also do not allow guns." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(4/8/2015)
|
| And this a "change" how ? Its ever been thus in my lifetime. The NRA has always respected the local laws of its convention hosts. It seems some segments of the media are trying, (almost to the point of absurdity), to create a "conflict" where there is none. Hostelries with a "prohibitive policy" regarding CCW or firearms will likely not be patronized by ANRA attendees. That's their economic loss and a small inconvenience to NRA members, who will doubtless remember their names. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
