|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(9/8/2015)
|
The last batch of gun laws didn't do anything to reduce gun crime, why do these stupid liberals believe more laws will make any difference.
And the statement, "We can protect the Second Amendment and legitimate gun owners" is an outright lie. They protected legitimate gun owners with the Safe Act by making felons out of 100,000 or so previously legitimate gun owners.
Furthermore, the miscreants that shot Mr. Gabay were probably already in jail at least once and let go under the liberals catch and release program.
Actually, Cuomo is delusional if he thinks that the criminals will obey any gun laws when the punishment is so uncertain and between bail and probation the time actually spent in prison is laughable. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/8/2015)
|
Of COURSE he does.
The sun rose in the East this morning, didn't it? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
