|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Trump riles with suggestion Clinton's security disarm: 'Let's see what happens to her!'
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Donald Trump raised eyebrows Friday night by suggesting Hillary Clinton's security detail should disarm itself so the whole world can see what would happen to the Democratic nominee.
"I think her bodyguards should drop all weapons. They should disarm immediately," the GOP nominee said at a campaign stop in Miami, Florida.
"Take their guns away, let's see what happens to her!" he said.
His comments, which were made as he argued a Clinton presidency would lead to the dismantling of the Second Amendment, did not find a warm reception with certain media figures. |
| Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(9/17/2016)
|
"Just the GOP nominee hinting at the assassination of his opponent!"
HAHAHA... GOOOOOOO TRUMP!
*** HIPOCRITES EXPOSED!!! ***
SO! THE FATHERLESS LOW-LIFE's PLAINLY ADMIT -after 60 years(!) of Deception- THAT DISARMING THE POPULACE ... IS JUST MURDER!
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
