|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
sheldonsthomas
(2/26/2016)
|
Nothing actually changed, merely shuffled the wording. See SB 130 2016 (4)(b): (4) Any person who recreationally discharges a firearm
15 outdoors, including target shooting, in an area that the person
16 knows or reasonably should know is primarily residential in
17 nature and that has a residential density of one or more
18 dwelling units per acre, commits a misdemeanor of the first
19 degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This
20 subsection does not apply:
22 performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm;
23 (b) If, under the circumstances, the discharge does not
24 pose a reasonably foreseeable risk to life, safety, or property;
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
