| 
            
              | 
 | 
                
                
                  
                    | 
                              
                                   
                                        | 
                              
                              
                              NOTE! 
                               
                              This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
                      free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
                      Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
                      reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
                      any other living person besides the one who posted them.
                      Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
                              comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
                              Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
                              bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
                              other small-minded people.  Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
                              
                              
                                         |  
                         
                         The
                      Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
                         
                                       
                                            
                      
     
  
    | Reading of history about Nazi and guns fallacious Submitted by: 
			
Bruce W. Krafft
 Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
 | 
			There 
				are 3  comments 
			 	on this storyPost Comments | Read Comments
 |  
    | "In response to the March 22 letter, 'Don’t allow U.S. leaders to disarm our citizens,' Stephen Halbrook is not a Second Amendment 'scholar,' but a spokesman for the [NRA's] point of view."
 
 "All of his writings argue against any kind of regulation of firearms. His argument that the Jews, who couldn’t buy guns, were defenseless because of that is faulty. The roundup of Jews who were sent to concentration camps was committed by the Waffen SS, the toughest arm of a tough army."
 
 "... How could Jews, if they had a pistol or rifle, defend against battle-tested men, Panzer tanks, Stuka dive bombers, etc? The idea is ridiculous and insulting to the Jewish people." ...
 -------
 
 Submitter's Note: Three words for you Mike: Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
 |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     Sosalty
     (3/24/2015) |  
    | Not only are the historically literate aware of the Jews defending themselves in isolated incidences during WWII, but even today our govt is somewhat more civilized due to the fact that there's a 10's of millions of peaceful gun owners. |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     Sosalty
     (3/24/2015) |  
    | Better to have 10's of millions of peaceful gun owners coexisting with a civil govt than to be disarmed and as helpless as the Jews during WWII. |  
 
 
     
  
    | Comment by: 
     jac
     (3/24/2015) |  
    | Obviously, the writer of this letter is not a scholar or student of history or he would know that over 50 million people were exterminated during the 20th century after their government passed gun control and eliminated their ability to defend themselves.  And that included the Jews under the Nazi government. |  
 
 |  |  
              | QUOTES
                TO REMEMBER |  
              | 
                    
                      | To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |  |  |