
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NM: Stand-your-ground laws can be lethal
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Information is still emerging about the case of Ahmaud Arbery — the unarmed 25-year-old slain on a quiet Georgia street — but what is known is disturbing. Two men eventually arrested in the killing told police that Arbery was running down the road and that they thought he was a burglar and shot him in self-defense. A third man was arrested Thursday. Before state officials intervened, following months of delay, a prosecutor cited Georgia’s stand-your-ground law as an exonerating factor.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/23/2020)
|
"Stand-your-ground laws change this traditional last resort — potentially lethal violence — into a permissible first resort. The idea is to empower victims of crime. Instead, the laws create more victims."
It does not in the first instance, and it does in the second. The time it takes to decide that one cannot retreat before acting increases the danger. The attacker has the advantage of surprise.
Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife." Just so. And, if the Rand Corporation is "non-partisan," then I'm Pope Francis. Its 'studies' are anything but unbiased, and it has a documented history of dissembling with regard to the constitutional right to bear arms for self-defense. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|