|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(2/26/2021)
|
| This is really dangerous because the 9th circus could do ANYTHING. Two previous pro gun rulings in this case (one by the district judge and one by the 3 judge appellate panel) have now been set aside. We start all over now and I'm concerned the deep state, which controls the federal judiciary, will uphold commiefornia's totally unconstitutional "law." But in that scenario, since an adverse ruling from the full appellate court would conflict with two previous rulings, we would have a chance of getting to scotus, but scotus has been ignoring good 2nd amendment cases by the dozen. So who knows. Our rights should NOT be in this precarious of a position. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms. — Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym "A Pennsylvanian" in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1. |
|
|
