|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Elmer Fudd will not use a gun in new 'Looney Tunes' cartoons
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Elmer Fudd has made a big change for the newest series of "Looney Tunes" cartoons. In the latest update of the series -- called "Looney Tunes Cartoons" and streaming on HBO Max -- the iconic character will no longer use a gun, according to the people behind the show. “We’re not doing guns,” executive producer Peter Browngardt told The New York Times. “But, we can do cartoony violence — TNT, the Acme stuff. All that was kind of grandfathered in.” |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(6/8/2020)
|
| Another American icon gone to hell because of political correctness |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/8/2020)
|
| Just more liberal indoctrination of our children. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/8/2020)
|
Ditto to the above two posts.
On a slight veer: it sounds like they'd be better of with Wile E. Coyote and the Roadrunner. Lots of Acme contraptions but no guns, 'cuz, ya know, coyotes don't use guns.
Just Rube Goldberg contrsptions. ;) |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/8/2020)
|
| Of course. 'Had to happen. Who else but the original Fudd would give up his guns without so much as a murmur? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
