|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
gruhn
(1/22/2017)
|
This must have gotten scrambled on the transcription table. Here, let me correct it for you :
"Will US President Donald Trump's administration uphold citizens’ legal right to bear arms to protect themselves...?"
And while we're at it, let's note that it isn't "the USA" that is being discussed. It is the "federal government of the USA." Different entities.
And note that it reads "at every level of our judicial system." Not "We'll take positive legislative action," just "we'll file a friend of the court and wring our hands when we lose because of bad precedent or hostile judges. 'Hey, _we_ upheld it. Our hands were tied by historic forces."
Will the REALLY defend your rights? We'll see. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|