|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(5/10/2017)
|
| Note: former judge, he belives anyone in front of a judge is guilty, hands down!!! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/10/2017)
|
More Chicken Little nonsense.
The very idea that "clear and convincing evidence" should not be necessary to bind a person over for trial is inherently elitist and tyrannical.
I doper commits felony armed robbery and shoots someone. The facts on the ground are that he WAS involved, in flagrante delicto. He claims SYG immunity, saying he was 'defending' himself.
Do you mean to tell me that any judge, under the 'revised' SYG law, would GRANT such a dirtball immunity from prosecution?
Pu-LEEZE. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
