|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OR: Board wants all unarmed
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.freelibertywriters.com/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"In Appaloosa, the town created by the late Robert B. Parker, the council hires Virgil Cole and his friend Everett Hitch to restore order."
"Cole has a simple system: No guns. If he sees somebody with a gun, he’ll ask him to hand it over."
"What if he refuses? 'I'll shoot him,' Cole says."
"This works in Appaloosa because Cole does shoot people now and then and the town ... can’t have more than 200 inhabitants, if that."
"It would not work on a campus with 20,000 students plus thousands of employees. Also, there’s hell to pay if the law shoots anybody who refuses an order."
"Which brings us to the wishful thinkers on the state Board of Higher Education and in the chancellor’s office of the Oregon University System. ..." ... -------
H/t to David Codrea who points out that Cole's policy works because it is fiction. |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|