
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Pelosi Claims Future President Could Use “National Emergency” to Target Guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 5 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Under the National Emergencies Act, when tasked with a pressing matter a president may declare a national emergency in order to activate certain statutory powers the Congress has authorized that would otherwise be unavailable to him. In this instance, President Trump has cited the power provided by 10 U.S.C. 2808, which permits the executive branch to undertake military construction projects in the event of a declared national emergency, in order to shift funds to the construction of a border wall.
There is no analogous statute that would authorize the executive branch to enact long-rejected gun control policies following the declaration of a national emergency. |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(2/23/2019)
|
Wish list of Democratic Socialists who constantly break that Oath of Office. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/23/2019)
|
Pelosi's an idiot, and so are all the other Democrats in government.
AAMOF, Democrat voters are idiots as well, or we wouldn't HAVE Democrats in government. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/23/2019)
|
I didn't think demorats required an "emergency" declaration to ban or confiscate guns. I thought it was their standard platform.
[/sarcasm] |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/23/2019)
|
I didn't think demorats required an "emergency" declaration to ban or confiscate guns. I thought it was their standard platform.
[/sarcasm] |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|