
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: Take away guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Why is it so hard to comprehend this concept? Just take away the guns, and our children won't get killed.
Is money more important than our children's lives? The National Rifle Association and the antiquated Second Amendment should not take priority over these innocent lives.
I am a members[sic] of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and I am very proud of my ancestry and heritage and patriots that fought for my freedom, but that was then and this is now. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/25/2018)
|
Wadda schmuck.
There's nothing 'hard' about it per se. Lenin, Mao, Hitler and Stalin took away fundamental rights all the time!
What IS 'hard' about it HERE is that our country was founded on individual rights, autonomy and ordered liberty guaranteed by the people's ability to be armed, and no matter what, 80+ million of us WILL NOT allow that to happen. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/25/2018)
|
Try to take away guns........
.....And a LOT of uniforms are gonna likely get lots of free samples ..... of lead..... ain't gonna be pretty.
M O L O N L A B E ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|