|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
RichardJCoon
(7/30/2020)
|
“This is not a peaceful assertion of First Amendment rights. This is not what we want to protect. This is reckless, and it’s dangerous,” she said.
Pretty sure this lady was talking about Portland, Seattle, Denver, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, etc. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/30/2020)
|
“This is not a peaceful assertion of First Amendment rights. This is not what we want to protect. This is reckless, and it’s dangerous,” she said.
Lady, you don't have a choice. You HAVE to protect it, because the 1A doesn't exclude exercising 2A rights at the same time.
Or, is that concept too difficult for your tiny mind to comprehend? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
