
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
4th Circuit on target
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The full 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia — widely considered to be the nation’s most conservative appellate court — found that the Second Amendment does not preclude state legislators from passing laws to protect the public from gun violence. Imagine that.
By a 10-4 vote, the full court upheld a Maryland law banning semiautomatic rifles that include certain military features, and high-capacity ammunition magazines. |
Comment by:
laker1
(2/23/2017)
|
Obviously these dupes are firearm ignorant. These guns are responsible for the least of gun deaths. With that logic they would ban all handguns which are responsible for the most gun caused deaths. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/23/2017)
|
IP, and STINK, and pig fart poopy FINK. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|