
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Campus carry in Effect at all Alamo Colleges Beginning Tuesday
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It is now legal to carry a gun on all the campuses of the Alamo Colleges district. The signs have been posted, the e-mails have been sent out to the students, and the faculty has been briefed all in preparation for the state law, which went into effect on August 1 at all two-year colleges across Texas. This follows on the footsteps of all state 4 year universities doing the same a year ago. But for some of the students at San Antonio College there is still some apprehension. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/2/2017)
|
Anna Calderon explains, "If something were to happen and everyone has guns, you don't know who's the bad guy or the good guy, so it can be very dangerous."
More dangerous than a deranged guy with a gun walking through unopposed and randomly shooting people like YOU????
Gawd DAMN, girl, you is STOOPID.
And Victor says, "Because anybody can carry a gun, anybody can have a license, anyone can go around and shoot people."
Yo, dimwit. Not just "anybody" can have a license, only people of legal age with no criminal or mental health record, and not restrained by a domestic violence order. Second, "anybody" can go around and shoot people NOW without a permit. Who's going to stop them, except the "anybodies" who have licenses and are carrying? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|