
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
mickey
(12/4/2020)
|
The current boyfriend went after the ex who was just sitting in a parked car with the girlfriend?
Yep, and the ex had a legitimate right to kill the boyfriend in self defense, not the other way around. You don't get to force your way into somebody else's stopped car so you can stab him, and then claim you stabbed him in self defense.
"Surveillance video obtained by The News shows Williams standing next to the SUV arguing with the people inside for just over a minute.
He then walked around to the driver’s side, swung open the door, and started stabbing Hawthorne.
When the passenger door opened, Williams hustled around the front of the SUV and jumped in. He hung on as the vehicle lurched forward." |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|