|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(5/6/2021)
|
Having to renew a license to carry every 5 years is a burden. I have had a carry license since I was 18 years old, but do not have one currently because of that exact burden.
One should not have to jump through hoops or pay a fee to exercise a constitutional right. The courts have ruled that poll taxes and restrictions on voting are unconstitutional. Why should the second amendment be different?
People know that you can't shoot someone except in self defense. Many states never had a training requirement to obtain a concealed carry permit, and that has not been a problem. Nor has there been a problem in the 19 or so states that have constitutional carry.
(Continued) |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/6/2021)
|
| This guy claims to be a friend of the second amendment, but he could have fooled me. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/6/2021)
|
The author is a 10th Amendment troglodyte.
The 14th Amendment exists precisely to delegate to the federal government the authority to impose the Bill of Rights on the states.
Wake up, dude. The 10th Amendment still has its purpose, but as it pertains to the Bill of Rights, state power has effectively been attenuated by the constitutional process of delegating that power to the United States. It is therefore legitimate, and that's the reality. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
