|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
One in Five Americans Wants the Second Amendment to be Repealed, National Survey Finds
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
One consequence of the success of the National Rifle Association's expansive gun-rights agenda — and its lobbying power in Congress — is that groups favoring more gun control have pared down their ambitions in recent years. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, for instance, no longer talks about banning handguns. Advocates have moved away from the term “gun control” in favor of more specific language like “gun violence” and “gun safety.” Democratic leaders in Congress have grown timid about proposing significant new restrictions on gun ownership. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/28/2018)
|
| 20 percent is actually a pretty low percentage considering all the flaming liberals in the country. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(3/28/2018)
|
| They did not poll in AZ!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/28/2018)
|
Despite former Justice John Paul Jackwagon's recent editorial, the second amendment is not going to be repealed. Even Dingbat Diane Feinstein of Commiefornya has said that it's far too hard to do.
And she is correct, for once.
The liberals would love it if it were to happen.
If it did happen, then watch out for Civil War 2.0 |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
